Consumer Value and Risk Perception on Consumer Purchase Intention in Athletic Shoe Markets

Authors

  • Rinaldi Bursan Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Lampung 35141, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v11i2.2108

Keywords:

Athletic footwear, brand management, consumer behavior, purchase intention, sportswear industry

Abstract

In the ever-evolving sports equipment industry, iconic brands like Adidas, Nike, and Puma have transcended their athletic origins to become fashion symbols, adapting to the preferences of the modern consumer. Brand recognition plays a crucial role in distinguishing quality products, aiding effective marketing efforts, segmentation, and customer loyalty. This study delves into the brand management strategies of these leading athletic shoe companies, focusing on how they maintain their brand presence in a fiercely competitive market and adapt to changing consumer trends. Employing a quantitative approach, we examined the relationship between Consumer Value, Brand Awareness, and Risk Perception and their impact on Purchase Intention among consumers seeking to purchase Nike shoes. Our findings highlight the significant influence of these factors on Purchase Intention, reinforcing their importance in consumer decision-making. We recommend strategies for Nike, such as enhancing product quality and introducing distinctive shoe designs, leveraging social media for brand awareness, and implementing features to reduce counterfeit risks, all aimed at shaping the future of the athletic shoe industry.

Keywords: Athletic footwear, brand management, consumer behavior, purchase intention, sportswear industry

 

ABSTRAK

Dalam industri peralatan olahraga yang terus berubah, merek-merek terkenal seperti Adidas, Nike, dan Puma telah melampaui akar mereka dalam olahraga untuk menjadi simbol mode, mengikuti preferensi konsumen modern. Pengenalan merek memainkan peran penting dalam membedakan produk berkualitas, membantu upaya pemasaran yang efektif, segmentasi, dan membangun loyalitas pelanggan. Penelitian ini menyelidiki strategi manajemen merek dari perusahaan sepatu olahraga terkemuka ini, dengan fokus pada bagaimana mereka menjaga kehadiran merek mereka di pasar yang sangat kompetitif dan beradaptasi dengan tren konsumen yang berubah. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif, kami mengeksplorasi hubungan antara Nilai Konsumen, Kesadaran Merek, dan Persepsi Risiko serta dampaknya pada Niat Pembelian di kalangan konsumen yang ingin membeli sepatu Nike. Hasil penelitian kami menunjukkan pengaruh signifikan dari faktor-faktor ini pada Niat Pembelian, yang mengukuhkan pentingnya mereka dalam keputusan konsumen. Kami juga memberikan rekomendasi strategis untuk Nike, seperti meningkatkan kualitas produk dan menghadirkan desain sepatu yang unik, memanfaatkan media sosial untuk meningkatkan kesadaran merek, dan mengimplementasikan fitur-fitur untuk mengurangi risiko barang palsu, semuanya bertujuan untuk membentuk masa depan industri sepatu olahraga..

Kata kunci: Sepatu olahraga, manajemen merek, perilaku konsumen, niat beli konsumen, industri pakaian olahraga.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Armstrong, G., Adam, S., Denize, S., & Kotler, P. (2014). Principles of marketing. Pearson Australia.

Chen, C. C. M., Nguyen, B., Melewar, T. C., & Dennis, C. (2017). Investigating the uses of corporate reputation and its effects on brand segmentation, brand differentiation, and brand positioning: Evidence from the Taiwanese pharmaceutical industry. International Studies of Management & Organization, 47(3), 240-257.

Eelen, J., Özturan, P., & Verlegh, P. W. (2017). The differential impact of brand loyalty on traditional and online word of mouth: The moderating roles of self-brand connection and the desire to help the brand. International journal of research in marketing, 34(4), 872-891.

Gupta, S., Gallear, D., Rudd, J., & Foroudi, P. (2020). The impact of brand value on brand competitiveness. Journal of Business Research, 112, 210-222.

Han, M. C., & Kim, Y. (2017). Why consumers hesitate to shop online: Perceived risk and product involvement on Taobao. com. Journal of promotion management, 23(1), 24-44.

Kotler, P. D. K., & Lane, K. (2016). Marketing Management. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc

Kotler, P., Keller, K. L., Ang, S. H., Tan, C. T., & Leong, S. M. (2018). Marketing management: an Asian perspective. London: Pearson.

Mehra, P. (2017). Factors influencing purchase behaviour of branded sports shoes. SCMS Journal of Indian Management, 14(4), 54-63.

Moreira, A. C., Fortes, N., & Santiago, R. (2017). Influence of sensory stimuli on brand experience, brand equity and purchase intention. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 18(1), 68-83.

Murphy, M. C., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Mindsets shape consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(1), 127-136.

Pappas, N. (2016). Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 29, 92-103.

Veloutsou, C., & Delgado-Ballester, E. (2018). New challenges in brand management. Spanish Journal of Marketing-ESIC, 22(3), 254-271.

Vinita, V. (2018). A Study of Factors Affecting on Customers Purchase Intention. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 2.

Yeh, C. H., Wang, Y. S., & Yieh, K. (2016). Predicting smartphone brand loyalty: Consumer value and consumer-brand identification perspectives. International Journal of Information Management, 36(3), 245-257.

Yoo, J., & Park, M. (2016). The effects of e-mass customization on consumer perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty toward luxury brands. Journal of business research, 69(12), 5775-5784.

Zauner, A., Koller, M., & Hatak, I. (2015). Customer perceived value—Conceptualization and avenues for future research. Cogent psychology, 2(1), 1061782.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-01

How to Cite

Bursan, R. (2023). Consumer Value and Risk Perception on Consumer Purchase Intention in Athletic Shoe Markets. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 11(2), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v11i2.2108