The Influence of Audit Quality, Profitability, Liquidity, Solvency on Going Concern Audit Opinions: A Literature Review

Authors

  • Tasyanari Handayani Department of Accounting, Faculty Economics, Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia
  • Meisya Kusumaningtyas Department of Accounting, Faculty Economics, Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia
  • Ratih Tantri Pratiwi Department of Accounting, Faculty Economics, Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia
  • Esha Saraswati Suryanto Department of Accounting, Faculty Economics, Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia
  • Herlina Manurung Department of Accounting, Faculty Economics, Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia

Keywords:

Going concern audit opinion, Audit quality, Profitability, Liquidity, Solvency

Abstract

This article aims to determine the impact of audit quality, profitability, solvency, and leverage on the going concern audit opinion. The literature review is crafted to pinpoint hypotheses between variables, employing documentary studies and utilizing quantitative methods with secondary data from prior articles. The findings indicate that audit quality, profitability, and liquidity variables do not exhibit a significant negative effect on the going concern audit opinion. However, the solvency variable is identified to have a positive influence on the going concern audit opinion. These outcomes imply that maintaining high audit quality, ensuring profitability and liquidity, while managing solvency effectively, are crucial elements in forming a comprehensive and accurate assessment of a company's ability to sustain operations. These insights contribute to refining audit practices and decision-making processes for stakeholders, fostering a more robust foundation for corporate governance and financial reporting.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, L. J., Daugherty, B., Parker, S., & Peters, G. F. (2016). Internal audit quality and financial reporting quality: The joint importance of independence and competence. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 3-40.

Akbar, R., & Ridwan, R. (2019). Pengaruh Kondisi Keuangan Perusahaan, Ukuran Perusahaan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan Dan Reputasi Kap Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Pertambangan Yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2017. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi, 4(2), 286-303.

Anggraini, N., Pusparini, H., & Hudaya, R. (2021). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Dan Solvabilitas Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 6(1), 24-55.

Anggraini, N., Pusparini, H., & Hudaya, R. (2021). Pengaruh profitabilitas, likuiditas, dan solvabilitas terhadap opini audit going concern. Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 6(1), 24-55

Banias, W. E., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Profitabilitas, dan Leverage Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern (Literature Review). Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(1), 80-88.

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of accounting and economics, 3(3), 183-199.

Ginting, S., & Suryana, L. (2014). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Opini Audit Going Concern pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Wira Ekonomi Mikroskil, 4(2), 111-120.

Glover, S. M., Taylor, M. H., Wu, Y. J., & Trotman, K. T. (2019). Mind the gap: Why do experts have differences of opinion regarding the sufficiency of audit evidence supporting complex fair value measurements?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(3), 1417-1460.

Gray, G. L., Turner, J. L., Coram, P. J., & Mock, T. J. (2011). Perceptions and misperceptions regarding the unqualified auditor's report by financial statement preparers, users, and auditors. Accounting Horizons, 25(4), 659-684.

Haryanto, Y. A., & Sudarno, S. (2019). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Solvabilitas, Likuiditas, Dan Rasio Pasar Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 8(4); 1-13.

Hossain, S., Chapple, L., & Monroe, G. S. (2018). Does auditor gender affect issuing going‐concern decisions for financially distressed clients?. Accounting & Finance, 58(4), 1027-1061.

Indriastuti, M. (2016). Pengaruh Profitabilitas dan Likuiditas terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Fokus Ekonomi: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi, 11(2); 37-50.

Juanda, A., & Lamury, T. F. (2021). Kualitas audit, profitabilitas, leverage dan struktur kepemilikan terhadap opini audit going concern. Jurnal Akademi Akuntansi, 4(2), 270-287.

Kepramareni, P., Pradnyawati, S. O., & Astari, N. K. A. (2023). Factors Related to Acceptance of Going Concern Audit Opinion in Banking Companies. Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis Jagaditha, 10(2), 168-176.

Kusumaningrum, Y., & Zulaikha, Z. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Likuiditas Dan Leverage Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 8(4); 1-12.

Laitinen, E. K. (2002). A dynamic performance measurement system: evidence from small Finnish technology companies. Scandinavian journal of management, 18(1), 65-99.

Lin, K. Z., & Chan, K. H. (2000). Auditing standards in China—A comparative analysis with relevant international standards and guidelines. The International Journal of Accounting, 35(4), 559-577.

Mala, R., & Chand, P. (2015). Judgment and decision‐making research in auditing and accounting: future research implications of person, task, and environment perspective. Accounting Perspectives, 14(1), 1-50.

Nurdiono, N., Junaidi, J., & Hartadi, B. (2016). The Effect Of Term Relationship Between The Auditor And Clients On Auditor Independence. International Journal Of Applied Business And Economic Research, 14(13).

Pasaribu, A. M. (2015). Pengaruh Kualitas Auditor, Likuiditas, Solvabilitas Dan Profitabilitas Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Sub Sektor Makanan Dan Minuman Yang Terdaftar Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. JRAK: Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 6(2), 80-92.

Ramadhan, A. P., & Sumardjo, M. (2021). Previous years audit opinions, profitability, audit tenure and quality control system on going concern audit opinion. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(2), 140-145.

Robu, M. A., & Robu, I. B. (2015). The influence of the audit report on the relevance of accounting information reported by listed Romanian companies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 20, 562-570.

Syarif, R. M., Saebani, A., & Julianto, W. (2021). Pengaruh kualitas audit, pertumbuhan perusahaan, dan kondisi keuangan perusahaan terhadap penerimaan opini audit going concern. Konferensi Riset Nasional Ekonomi Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 2(1), 45-58.

Tamulevičienė, D. (2016). Methodology of complex analysis of companies’ profitability. Entrepreneurship and sustainability issues, 4, 53-63.

Wahyuni, S. (2021). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, Leverage dan Pertumbuhan Perusahaan terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern Pada Perusahaan Subsektor Makanan dan Minuman di Bursa Efek Indonesia. FIN-ACC (Finance Accounting), 6(5), 686-696.

Widoretno, A. A. (2019). Factors That Influence the Acceptance of Going Concern Audit Opinion on Manufacture Companies. Journal of Economics, Business, and Government Challenges, 2(1), 49-57.

Zéman, Z., & Lentner, C. (2018). The changing role of going concern assumption supporting management decisions after financial crisis. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 18(1), 428-441.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-01

How to Cite

Handayani, T., Kusumaningtyas, M., Pratiwi, R., Suryanto, E., & Manurung, H. (2023). The Influence of Audit Quality, Profitability, Liquidity, Solvency on Going Concern Audit Opinions: A Literature Review. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 11(3), 783–790. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ibik.ac.id/index.php/jimkes/article/view/2194