Analysis of Porter's Five Forces on PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk

Authors

  • Juhari Juhari Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura; Bangkalan, Indonesia
  • Mochammad Isa Anshori Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura; Bangkalan, Indonesia
  • Nurita Adriani Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Trunojoyo Madura; Bangkalan, Indonesia

Keywords:

BRI, Credit, Banking, Porters Five Force

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze Porter’s Five competitive force strategies of PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk. To compete in the banking industry. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative method. The data used is secondary data, with data collection using documentation data. From the results of research using five competitive forces PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk has a competitive advantage in the field of MSME credit, in lending. In 2022, BRI distributed credit amounting to 16.05% of total national credit. In maintaining this competitive advantage, BRI develops transformation strategies innovation in facing competition and change (adaptable). BRI provides digital services in banking activities, whether opening an account or making transactions using the Brimo application, even at the medium business or corporate level use the Business Internet Banking Application (Ibbiz) with more complete facilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ashta, A., & Herrmann, H. (2021). Artificial intelligence and fintech: An overview of opportunities and risks for banking, investments, and microfinance. Strategic Change, 30(3), 211-222.

Bhegawati, D. A. S., & Utama, M. S. (2020). The role of banking in Indonesia in increasing economic growth and community welfare. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 22(1), 83-91.

Bindseil, U. (2019). Central bank digital currency: Financial system implications and control. International Journal of Political Economy, 48(4), 303-335.

Bruijl, D. G. H. T. (2018). The relevance of Porter’s five forces in today’s innovative and changing business environment. Available at SSRN 3192207.

Choiriyah, C., Saprida, S., & Sari, E. (2021). Development of Sharia Banking System In Indonesia. Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law, 5(1), 17-28.

Dewi, I. G. A. A. O., & Dewi, I. G. A. A. P. (2017). Corporate social responsibility, green banking, and going concern on banking company in Indonesia stock exchange. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH), 1(3), 118-134.

Fahlevi, M., Irma, D., Maemunah, S., & Mahfud, I. (2019). The effect of financial performance, external factors, and operational ratio on CAR ratio of Sharia Commercial Banks in Indonesia. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 12(2), 2348-2355.

Ichsan, R., Suparmin, S., Yusuf, M., Ismal, R., & Sitompul, S. (2021). Determinant of Sharia Bank’s Financial Performance during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(1), 298-309.

Kalita, A., & Chepurenko, A. (2020). Competitiveness of small and medium businesses and competitive pressure in the manufacturing industry. Форсайт, 14(2 (eng)), 36-50.

Langodai, D. J., & Lutfillah, N. Q. (2019). The Influence of Third Party Funds, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Non Performing Loans to Credit Distribution on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Research In Management and Accounting (RIMA), 2(1), 14-25.

Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of business venturing, 16(5), 429-451.

Luo, Y. (2003). Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market: The case of China. Strategic management journal, 24(13), 1315-1327.

Mooij, J., & Prast, H. (2003). A brief history of the institutional design of banking supervision in the Netherlands. Banking Supervision at the Crossroads, edited by TG Kuppens, HM Prast, and SAT Wesseling. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 10-37.

Mukhlis, I., Hidayah, I., & Retnasih, N. R. (2020). Interest Rate Volatility of the Federal Funds Rate: Response of the Bank Indonesia and its Impact on the Indonesian Economic Stability. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 9(1), 111-133.

Natoli, F. (2021). Financialization of commodities before and after the great financial crisis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 35(2), 488-511.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Industry structure and competitive strategy: Keys to profitability. Financial analysts journal, 36(4), 30-41.

Porter, M. E. (2007). Understanding industry structure. Harvard Business School, 13, 1-16.

Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review, 86(1), 78-93.

Quemin, S., & Pahle, M. (2023). Financials threaten to undermine the functioning of emissions markets. Nature Climate Change, 13(1), 22-31.

Rejekiningsih, T. W., Kurnia, A. S., & Sugiyanto, F. X. (2022). Analysis of efficiency of intermediation functions from financial institutions and consumer surplus of funds in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Finance Studies, 14(1), 377-408.

Sukmana, R., Ajija, S. R., Salama, S. C. U., & Hudaifah, A. (2020). Financial performance of rural banks in Indonesia: A two-stage DEA approach. Heliyon, 6(7), e04390.

Werner, R. A. (2014). Can banks individually create money out of nothing?—The theories and the empirical evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 36, 1-19.

Werner, R. A. (2016). A lost century in economics: Three theories of banking and the conclusive evidence. International Review of Financial Analysis, 46, 361-379.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-20

How to Cite

Juhari, J., Anshori, M., & Adriani, N. (2023). Analysis of Porter’s Five Forces on PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero), Tbk. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 11(3), 1233–1240. Retrieved from https://jurnal.ibik.ac.id/index.php/jimkes/article/view/2264