The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and Tourism Development on Regional Development in Berau Regency

Rahcmad Suharto; Zamruddin Hasid; Laode Ilyas; Swadia Mahardika

doi:10.37641/jimkes.v11i3.2282

Authors

Rahcmad Budi Suharto Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
Zamruddin Hasid Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
Laode Ilyas Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia
Swadia Gandhi Mahardika Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Mulawarman, Samarinda, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v11i3.2282

Keywords:

Corporate social responsibility, tourism, regional finance, regional development

Abstract

The aim of the research is to test the truth of regional development theories, namely firm location theory and new economic geography theory, as well as functional development theory, with the research object being the PT company. Berau Coal in Berau district, East Kalimantan province. It recommends the results of research, namely the corporate social responsibility program and tourism development, towards regional development in Berau Regency, East Kalimantan Province. The method used in this research is a quantitative research method. Multivariate analysis is used in analyzing research, involving variables in a number greater than or equal to three variables. WarpPLS is mutivariate-based and can analyze structural equation modeling (SEM). The results of the research show that PT Berau Coal's corporate social responsibility (CSR) program has a positive and significant effect on regional development. The tourism development that has been carried out has been proven to have a positive and significant effect on regional financial independence. The existence of the tourism industry in Berau district has increased regional development. Regional financial independence will become more independent if the contribution of regional original income (PAD) to funding regional development is greater.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adeleye, I., Luiz, J., Muthuri, J., & Amaeshi, K. (2020). Business ethics in Africa: The role of institutional context, social relevance, and development challenges. Journal of business ethics, 161, 717-729.

Barnes, T. J., & Abrahamsson, C. (2015). Tangled complicities and moral struggles: The Haushofers, father and son, and the spaces of Nazi geopolitics. Journal of Historical Geography, 47, 64-73.

Bieri, D. S. (2019). Das Geld im Raum: August Löschs Geldtheorie und ihre Bedeutung für regionalökonomische Verteilungsfragen. In Studien zur Entwicklung der ökonomischen Theorie. Duncker and Humblot.

Brin, P., & Nehme, M. N. Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis of Theories and Models. Eureka: Social and Humanities, (5), 22-30.

Bustani, B., Khaddafi, M., & Ilham, R. N. (2022). Regional Financial Management System of Regency/City Regional Original Income in Aceh Province Period Year 2016-2020. International Journal of Educational Review, Law, and Social Sciences (IJERLAS), 2(3), 459-468.

Capello, R. (2011). Location, regional growth, and local development theories. Location, Regional Growth and Local Development Theories, 1-25.

Cochrane, W., & Poot, J. (2021). Demand-driven theories and models of regional growth. Handbook of regional science, 661-678.

Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. (Eds.). (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context. Routledge.

DJPK. (2014). Modul Akuntansi Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah dan SKPD. Kursus Keuangan Daerah Khusus Penatausahaan. Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah (KKDK) TA 2014, 177-187.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Convergence of structural equation modeling and multilevel modeling. The SAGE handbook of innovation in social research methods, 562-589.

Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (ijec), 11(4), 1-10.

Lantos, G. P. (2001). The boundaries of strategic corporate social responsibility. Journal of consumer marketing, 18(7), 595-632.

Lee, M. D. P. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International journal of management reviews, 10(1), 53-73.

Petrakis, P. E. (2020). Theoretical approaches to economic growth and development. An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Switzerland: National and Kapodistrian University of Athens.

Ribeiro, R. S. M., McCombie, J. S., & Tadeu Lima, G. (2017). A reconciliation proposal of demand-driven growth models in open economies. Journal of Economic Studies, 44(2), 226-244.

Sandelin, B., & Trautwein, H. M. (2008). The Baltic Exchange: Mutual Influences between Economists in the German and Swedish Language Areas (No. 288). University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.

Solimun; Fernandes, Adji Achmad Rinaldo. (2017). Investigation of instrument validity: Investigate the consistency between criterion and unidimensional in instrument validity (case study in management research). Int'l JL & Mgmt., 59, 1203.

Tavani, D., & Zamparelli, L. (2018). Endogenous technical change in alternative theories of growth and distribution. Analytical Political Economy, 139-174.

Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational statistics & data analysis, 48(1), 159-205.

Vogel, D. (2007). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Brookings Institution Press.