Exploring the Role of Symbolic Convergence Theory in Enhancing Group Cohesiveness and Decision Making: A Systematic Literature Review Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v12i6.2864Keywords:
symbolic convergence theory, group, kekompakan, pengambilan keputusanAbstract
Symbolic Convergence Theory describes group cohesiveness and decision-making influenced by symbolic convergence and rhetorical vision because they affect how group members understand and share common social values. This research aims to provide an overview of the implementation of Symbolic Convergence Theory in group communication, especially in cohesiveness and group decision-making. This research uses the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method. This research systematically identifies and evaluates group cohesiveness and decision-making in several previous studies. However, along with the development of time and technology, direct and analog communication began to be less researched.
Keywords: Symbolic Convergence Theory, group, cohesiveness, decision-making
Downloads
References
Bormann, E. G. (1972). Fantasy and rhetorical vision: The rhetorical criticism of social reality. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58(4), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637209383138
Bormann, E. G. (1973). The Eagleton affair: A fantasy theme analysis. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 59(2), 143-159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335637309383163
Bormann, E. G. (1982). The symbolic convergence theory of communication: Applications and implications for teachers and consultants. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 10(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909888209365212
Bormann, E. G. (1985). Symbolic convergence theory: A communication formulation. Journal of Communication, 35(4), 128-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1985.tb02977.x
Bormann, E. G. (1994). Response to “revitalizing the study of small group communication”. Communication Studies, 45(1), 86-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979409368411
Bormann, E. G., Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (1996). An expansion of the rhetorical vision component of the symbolic convergence theory: The cold war paradigm case. Communication Monographs, 63(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376371
Bormann, E. G., Knutson, R. L., & Musolf, K. (1997). Why do people share fantasies? An empirical investigation of a basic tenet of the symbolic convergence communication theory. Communication Studies, 48(3), 254-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979709368504
Bormann, E. G., Cragan, J. F., & Shields, D. C. (2001). Three decades of developing, grounding, and using symbolic convergence theory (SCT). Annals of the International Communication Association, 25(1), 271-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2001.11679006
Halvorsen, K., & Sarangi, S. (2015). Team decision-making in workplace meetings: The interplay of activity roles and discourse roles. Journal of Pragmatics, 76, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.002
Horila, T. (2017). Contents and functions of dramatizations in team decision making. International Journal of Business Communication, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488417743983
Hossain, M., Islam, M. T., Momin, M. A., Nahar, S., & Alam, M. S. (2018). Understanding communication of sustainability reporting: Application of symbolic convergence theory (SCT). Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3874-6
Olufowote, J. O. (2006). Rousing and redirecting a sleeping giant: Symbolic convergence theory and complexities in the communicative constitution of collective action. Management Communication Quarterly, 19(3), 451–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318905280326
Henningsen, D. D., & Henningsen, M. L. M. (2017). Does brainstorming promote cohesiveness? How the rules of brainstorming mirror symbolic convergence. Communication Reports, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934215.2017.1394476
Knight, M. B., Pearson, J. M., & Hunsinger, D. S. (2008). The role of media richness in information technology-supported communication in group cohesion, agreeability, and performance. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 20(4), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.4018/joeuc.2008100102
McWhorter, C. (2021). VB strong: How local news stations created a platform for a community to mourn victims of a mass shooting. Atlantic Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2021.1891900
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... Moher, D. (2021, March 29). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. The BMJ, 372(71). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Poole, M. S., & Ahmed, I. (2008). Decision-making processes in organizations. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecd007
Saffer, A. J. (2016). A message-focused measurement of the communication dimension of social capital: Revealing shared meaning in a network of relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research, 28(3-4), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2016.1228065
Sheldon, Z. (2020). The limits of faith-based organizations: Lessons from a big idea. Communication Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2020.1749684
Zanin, A. C., Hoelscher, C. S., & Kramer, M. W. (2016). Extending symbolic convergence theory: A shared identity perspective of a team’s culture. Small Group Research, 47(4), 438–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416658554
