The Development Of Self-Employed Novice Entrepreneurs In Lampung Province, Indonesia

Authors

  • Yosy Arisandy Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu
  • Ani Mekaniwati Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan
  • Aang Munawar Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kesatuan
  • Iwan Darmawan Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia
  • Yose Rizal Kementerian Ketenagakerjaan Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i2.3510

Keywords:

Leadership Characteristics, Higher Education, Employee Index Preference

Abstract

The empowerment of novice entrepreneurs is vital for fostering inclusive economic development and addressing structural unemployment in Indonesia. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the Independent Novice Entrepreneur Program (Tenaga Kerja Mandiri Pemula/TKMP) implemented by the Ministry of Manpower in Lampung Province. Using a mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative data from surveys and progress reports with qualitative insights from interviews with mentors and participants. The program’s performance is assessed based on five Key Performance Indicators (KPIs): (1) production of goods/services, (2) implementation of marketing strategies, (3) maintenance of financial cash flow records, (4) acquisition of Business Identification Numbers (NIB), and (5) development of structured business plans. Findings reveal that the program exceeded the 60% achievement target across all KPIs, with the highest performance in product development (94.19%) and marketing strategy (91.60%). However, challenges remain in financial literacy, NIB registration, and long-term business sustainability. This study highlights the importance of continuous mentoring, digital literacy, and academic collaboration to strengthen entrepreneurial ecosystems at the local level. The results offer evidence-based recommendations for improving policy design and implementation of entrepreneurship support programs in developing regions.

 

Keywords:  novice entrepreneurs, entrepreneurship development, government program, business mentoring, financial literacy, digital marketing, Lampung Province, mixed-methods, policy evaluation, small business empowermen

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonderiene, R., & Majauskaite, M. (2016). Leadership Style and Job Satisfaction in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(1), 140-164.

Avolio, B. J., & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Mind Garden.

Badan Pusat Statistik DKI Jakarta. (2018). Number of Students: Higher Education: Jakarta.

Bateh, J., & Heyliger, W. (2014). Academic Administrator Leadership Styles and the Impact on Faculty Job Satisfaction. Journal of Leadership Education, 13(3), 34-49.

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership. Sage Publications.

Bryman, A. (2008). Effective leadership in higher education: A literature review. Studies in Higher Education, 33(6), 693-710. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070801685114

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.

Fakhri, M., Pradana, M., Syarifuddin, S., & Suhendra, Y. (2020). Leadership Style and its Impact on Employee Performance at Indonesian National Electricity Company. The Open Psychology Journal, 13, 321-325.

Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. Paulist Press.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis. Cengage Learning.

Hill, R. (1998). What sample size is "enough" in internet survey research? Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6(3-4), 1–12.

House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo Vadis? Journal of Management, 23(3), 409-473.

House, R. J. (1971). A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16(3), 321-339.

Kasalak, G., Dağyar, M., & Ok, U. (2022). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Leadership Styles and Job Satisfaction in Higher Education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(4), 571-592.

Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th ed.). Sage Publications.

Roscoe, J. T. (1975). Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley.

Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465

Suryani, T. (2014). Leadership Styles in Indonesia: Between Cultural Specificity and Universality. Tilburg University.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.

uniRank. (2024). Top Universities in Jakarta.

Wibowo, A., & Putra, R. (2023). An Exploratory Study on Effective Leadership and Change Management in Indonesian Public Universities. Sustainability, 17(3), 1300.

Wachdijono, W., Trisnaningsih, U., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). Analisis Preferensi Konsumen Kopi pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Agriekonomika, 8(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v8i2.5427

Wikaningrum, T., & Udin, A. S. (2019). Leadership Styles and Communication Skills at Indonesian Higher Education: Patterns, Influences, and Applications for Organization. KnE Social Sciences, 3(11), 456-478.

VanVoorhis, C. R. W., & Morgan, B. L. (2007). Understanding power and rules of thumb for determining sample sizes. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 3(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.03.2.p043

Downloads

Published

2025-03-16

How to Cite

Arisandy, Y., Mekaniwati, A., Munawar, A., Darmawan, I., & Rizal, Y. (2025). The Development Of Self-Employed Novice Entrepreneurs In Lampung Province, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 13(2), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i2.3510