The Impact of Budgetary Participation on Task Performance in Government Agencies: How Innovative Behavior Mediates the Relationship
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i4.3538Keywords:
Budget Participation, Employee Commitment, Innovative Behavior, Public Sector, Task PerformanceAbstract
Good budget planning enables the government to effectively establish priority scales and avoid overlapping programs between agencies. One crucial element in this process is budget participation, which not only strengthens employees' sense of ownership, responsibility, and commitment to organizational goals but also contributes to the efficiency of program implementation. This study aims to analyze the effect of budget participation and innovative behavior on task performance among civil servants in public sector in Jakarta, Indonesia. The research adopts a quantitative approach using a Likert scale questionnaire (1–7), distributed to 188 civil servants’ respondents selected through a simple random sampling technique. The collected data were analyzed using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) method with the help of SmartPLS 3 software. The results indicate that budget participation has a positive and significant effect on both innovative behavior and task performance. Furthermore, innovative behavior was found to mediate the relationship between budget participation and task performance, indicating that an innovative culture enhances the effectiveness of budget implementation in achieving performance targets. This research provides practical contributions in supporting bureaucratic reform and improving the quality of public services.
Downloads
References
Asif, A., & Rathore, K. (2021). Behavioral drivers of performance in public-sector organizations: A literature review. Sage Open, 11(1), 2158244021989283.
Augustine, A. A. (2022). Budgeting techniques and budgetary control in local governments: Participatory budgeting a critical instrument for sustainable development. International Journal of Management and Economics Invention, 8(11), 2682-2693.
Bandy, G. (2023). Financial management and accounting in the public sector. London: Routledge.
Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., Olejniczak, J., & Svobodová, L. (2020). How a participatory budget can support sustainable rural development—Lessons from Poland. Sustainability, 12(7), 2620.
Beuren, I. M., Souza, G. E. D., & Bernd, D. C. (2021). Effects of budget system use on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(1), 109-129.
Cho, Y. J., & Song, H. J. (2021). How to facilitate innovative behavior and organizational citizenship behavior: Evidence from public employees in Korea. Public Personnel Management, 50(4), 509-537.
Chukwu, H. O. (2023). Comparative analysis of economic development planning and development budgeting in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of African & Asian Studies (IJAAS), 9(4).
Dahana, M. A. (2020). Analysis of the budget planning process and budget execution process. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(4), 309-322.
Dewi Anggadini, S., Wulansari, L., & Damayanti, S. (2021). The influence of budget participation and organizational commitment to the performance of Regional Government Apparatus. International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology (IJMSIT), 1(2).
Guarini, E., Mori, E., & Zuffada, E. (2022). Localizing the sustainable development goals: A managerial perspective. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 34(5), 583-601.
Hameduddin, T., Fernandez, S., & Demircioglu, M. A. (2020). Conditions for open innovation in public organizations: Evidence from Challenge. gov. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 42(2), 111-131.
Irawan, A. (2023). Budgeting participation, managerial roles and competence on financial management performance. Atestasi: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 6(2), 587-601.
Jatmiko, B., Laras, T., & Rohmawati, A. (2020). Budgetary participation, organizational commitment, and performance of local government apparatuses. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), 379-390.
Jatmiko, B., Laras, T., & Rohmawati, A. (2020). Budgetary participation, organizational
Jung, S. M. (2022). Participatory budgeting and government efficiency: Evidence from municipal governments in South Korea. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 88(4), 1105-1123.
Koomson, S., Azadda, W. N., Opoku Mensah, A., & Gbadago, F. Y. (2025). Does innovative behaviour intervene between budgetary participation and performance in the public sector?. International Journal of Innovation Science, 17(2), 438-462.
Lee, H. J., Kim, M. Y., Park, S. M., & Robertson, P. J. (2020). Public service motivation and innovation in the Korean and Chinese public sectors: Exploring the role of Confucian values and social capital. International Public Management Journal, 23(4), 496-534.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological science, 1(4), 240-246.
Nguyen, N. T. H., Nguyen, D., Vo, N., & Tuan, L. T. (2023). Fostering public sector employees’ innovative behavior: The roles of servant leadership, public service motivation, and learning goal orientation. Administration & Society, 55(1), 30-63.
Pattiasina, V., Noch, M. Y., Rumasukun, M. R., Hijrah, L., Ikbal, M., & Tamaela, E. Y. (2023). Challenges in the implementation of government budgets: A case study of indonesian local governance. JABE (Journal of Accounting and Business Education), 8(1), 50-61.
Polzer, T., Nolte, I. M., & Seiwald, J. (2023). Gender budgeting in public financial management: a literature review and research agenda. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 89(2), 450-466.
Rafique, M. A., Hou, Y., Chudhery, M. A. Z., Gull, N., & Ahmed, S. J. (2023). The dimensional linkage between public service motivation and innovative behavior in public sector institutions; the mediating role of psychological empowerment. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(1), 207-229.
Sandi, H., Afni Yunita, N., Heikal, M., Nur Ilham, R., & Sinta, I. (2021). Relationship between budget participation, job characteristics, emotional intelligence and work motivation as mediator variables to strengthening user power performance: An emperical evidence from indonesia government. Morfai Journal, 1(1), 36-48.
Sofyani, H., Simali, M. F. I. S., Najda, T., & Al-Maghrebi, M. S. (2020). The role of budgetary participation and environmental uncertainty in influencing managerial performance of village government. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 21(2), 258-276.
Sung, W., & Kim, C. (2021). A study on the effect of change management on organizational Innovation: Focusing on the mediating effect of members’ innovative behavior. Sustainability, 13(4), 2079.
Suseno, Y., Standing, C., Gengatharen, D., & Nguyen, D. (2020). Innovative work behaviour in the public sector: The roles of task characteristics, social support, and proactivity. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(1), 41-59.
Tahar, A., & Sofyani, H. (2020). Budgetary participation, compensation, and performance of local working unit: The intervening role of organizational commitment. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 21(1), 145-161.
Tsamantouridis, K., Bellou, V., & Tsameti, A. (2023). Innovation in the public sector: insights into the job design that enhances public servants’ innovative behavior. International Journal of Public Administration, 46(16), 1125-1136.
Vuong, B. N. (2023). The influence of servant leadership on job performance through innovative work behavior: does public service motivation matter?. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(3), 295-315.
Yuhertiana, I., & Fatun, F. (2020). Performance-based budgeting in public sector and managerial performance with leadership as moderating variable. International Journal of Service Management and Sustainability (IJSMS), 5(1), 1-28.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





