Strategic Management of Post-Disaster Socioeconomic Recovery in the Industrial Revolution 4.0 Era

Rifai Rifai; Andy Feftra Wijaya

doi:10.37641/jimkes.v14i2.4604

Authors

Rifai Rifai Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia
Andy Feftra Wijaya Universitas Brawijaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v14i2.4604

Keywords:

Community Empowerment, Disaster Management, Industrial Revolution 4.0, Pentahelix Collaboration, Public-Private Partnership, Socioeconomic Recovery

Abstract

Socioeconomic recovery constitutes a crucial and strategic component of post-disaster management, grounded in the principle of building back better and safer. In the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, rapid and dynamic changes driven by information technology often produce field conditions that do not fully align with existing technical guidelines. This study aims to formulate a proposed model for socioeconomic recovery that integrates digital technology without disrupting administrative procedures while substantively achieving recovery objectives. This study employs a qualitative case study approach focusing on post-disaster communities in the era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, utilizing interviews with Disaster Management Agencies, followed by thematic analysis. The findings indicate that technology utilization, such as promoting fostered products through digital marketplaces, can strengthen enabling, empowering, and protecting stages of community development. Moreover, locally based approaches emphasizing local issues, authority, and accountability enhance program relevance and sustainability. The study concludes that effective reform requires strengthening networking and partnerships through public-private partnership schemes and fostering pentahelix collaboration among government, business, community, academia, and media actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, I., & Islam, M. R. (2024). Empowerment and participation: Key strategies for inclusive development. In Building strong communities: Ethical approaches to inclusive development (pp. 47–68). Leeds: Emerald Publishing Limited.

Ahmed, M., Raza, M. Y., Malik, N. A., & Malik, A. (2025). Climate-resilient agriculture (CRA): Pathway to sustainable development. In Climate Resilient and Sustainable Agriculture: Volume 1: Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies (pp. 185–212). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Andrews, C. J. (2017). Rationality in policy decision making. In Handbook of public policy analysis (pp. 187-198). London: Routledge.

Banha, F., Flores, A., & Coelho, L. S. (2022). A new conceptual framework and approach to decision making in public policy. Knowledge, 2(4), 539–556.

Barton-Hulsey, A., Collins, S. C., Therrien, M. C., Biggs, E. E., Romano, M., & Coltellino, B. (2023). Augmentative and alternative communication services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Contextual determinants of the parent–speech-language pathologist partnership. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32(6), 2889–2907.

Cazcarro, I., García-Gusano, D., Iribarren, D., Linares, P., Romero, J. C., Arocena, P., ... & Cadarso, M. Á. (2022). Energy-socio-economic-environmental modelling for the EU energy and post-COVID-19 transitions. Science of the Total Environment, 80(5), 5329-5335.

Demir, F. (2023). Evidence-based policy-making: Merits and challenges. In Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance (pp. 4524–4536). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Edelman, N. L. (2023). Trauma and resilience informed research principles and practice: A framework to improve the inclusion and experience of disadvantaged populations in health and social care research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 28(1), 66–75.

Ellikkal, A., & Rajamohan, S. (2025). AI-enabled personalized learning: empowering management students for improving engagement and academic performance. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 22(1), 28–44.

Gai, A. M., Sir, M. M., & Maulida, R. R. (2022). Influence analysis of regional loans on basic infrastructure establishment to recover economy during the Covid-19 pandemic in Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, (pp. 5124-5143). Bristol: IOP Publishing.

Ghimire, B. R. (2024). Public policy and governance: Catalyzing local development and economic growth. Journey for Sustainable Development and Peace Journal, 2(2), 39–53.

Hall, A. (2023). Arrow’s impossibility theorem: Computability in social choice theory. Retrieved on October 24, 2025, from https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.09789.

Harbusiuk, V., Blikhar, V., Rudnichenko, Y., & Havlovska, N. (2024). Socio-economic security of the region in war conditions: Damage assessment, modelling of recovery paths and their regulatory support. Social and Legal Studios, 2(7), 149–161.

Head, B. W. (2024). Reconsidering expertise for public policymaking: The challenges of contestability. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 83(2), 156–172.

Horokholinska, I., Vaskul, S., & Kvik, A. (2025). Post-secular revitalization of religion: Ukrainian experience of social initiatives by churches as a moral alternative to the political theology of war. Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe, 46(1), 3–12.

Inkina, S. (2019). Bureaucratic reform and Russian transition: The puzzles of policy-making process. Palgrave Communications, 5(1), 1-15.

Karnawati, D. (2018). Foreword by Dwikorita Karnawati for the journal of the international consortium on landslides. Landslides, 15(8), 1457-1458.

Kartasasmita, G. (2013). Managing Indonesia’s transformation: An oral history. Singapore: World Scientific.

Keraminiyage, K., & Piyatadsananon, P. (2013). Achieving success in post-disaster resettlement programmes through better coordination between spatial and socio-economic/cultural factors. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(3), 352-372.

Khan, N. U., & Han, H. (2023). Linking local collaborative governance and public service delivery: Mediating role of institutional capacity building. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–10.

Knill, C., Steinebach, Y., & Zink, D. (2024). How policy growth affects policy implementation: Bureaucratic overload and policy triage. Journal of European Public Policy, 31(2), 324–351.

Krantz, D. L. (1971). The separate worlds of operant and non-operant psychology. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4(1), 61-73.

Lemishko, О., Davydenko, N., & Shevchenko, A. (2022). Strategic directions of the economic recovery of post-war Ukraine. Journal of Innovations and Sustainability, 6(2), 10–19.

Li, Z., Pestourie, R., Lin, Z., Johnson, S. G., & Capasso, F. (2022). Empowering metasurfaces with inverse design: Principles and applications. ACS Photonics, 9(7), 2178–2192.

Marín-González, F., Moganadas, S. R., Paredes-Chacín, A. J., Yeo, S. F., & Subramaniam, S. (2022). Sustainable local development: Consolidated framework for cross-sectoral cooperation via a systematic approach. Sustainability, 14(11), 6601-6612.

Nahtigal, M. (2022). EU recovery plans, inclusive knowledge economy and overcoming regional disparities. Lex Localis-Journal of Local-Self Government, 20(4), 1171–1189.

Ngulube, N. K. (2024). Building back better together: Exploring community engagement in post-disaster recovery efforts—a review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Advancements, 2(2), 138–149.

Nikkhah, H. A., & Redzuan, M. (2009). Participation as a medium of empowerment in community development. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 170-176.

Okunola, O. H. (2025). Beyond institutional silos: Rethinking multilevel disaster risk governance in Africa a decade into the Sendai Framework implementation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 16(3), 321–332.

Prabawati, A., & Frimawaty, E. (2025). Strategies for strengthening partnerships in circular economy-based plastic waste management. Applied Environmental Science, 3(1), 61–76.

Rozikin, M. (2024). Multi-stakeholder communication and coordination systems in post-disaster socio-economic recovery collaboration. Jurnal Studi Komunikasi, 8(2), 287–304.

Saleh, A., Mujahiddin, M., & Gunawan, M. D. (2022). Optimizing corporate social responsibility funds for community empowerment and regional planning in urban slums. International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS), 3(3), 203–209.

Sandfort, J., & Moulton, S. (2014). Effective implementation in practice: Integrating public policy and management. John Wiley & Sons.

Saripudin, S., Hubeis, M., & Yusnita, N. (2022). The effect of the implementation of Partnership and Community Development (PK and BL) and self-reliance of community partners on community income. Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service, 3(14), 2625-2634.

Selvarajan, P. (2022). The impact of remedial teaching on improving the competencies of low achievers. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research, 11(01), 283–287.

Simon, H. A. (1990). Bounded rationality. In Utility and probability (pp. 15-18). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Song, Y., Li, C., Olshansky, R., Zhang, Y., & Xiao, Y. (2017). Are we planning for sustainable disaster recovery? Evaluating recovery plans after the Wenchuan earthquake. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(12), 2192-2216.

Sou, G. (2019). Sustainable resilience? Disaster recovery and the marginalization of sociocultural needs and concerns. Progress in Development Studies, 19(2), 144-159.

Tanesab, J. P. (2020). Institutional effectiveness and inclusions: Public perceptions on Indonesia’s disaster management authorities. International Journal of Disaster Management, 3(2), 1–15.

Widiastuti, T., Ningsih, S., Prasetyo, A., Mawardi, I., Herianingrum, S., Robani, A., ... & Hady, A. F. (2022). Developing an integrated model of Islamic social finance: Toward an effective governance framework. Heliyon, 8(9), 910-920.