Analysis of Financial Reporting Fraud with Fraud Hexagon Theory in Financial Companies in the Banking Sub-Sector in 2020-2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37641/jimkes.v13i1.3107Keywords:
Financial Stability, Rationalization, Ineffective Monitoring, Capability, Arrogance, Collusion, Financial Statement FraudAbstract
In a situation of economic constraints, the risk of fraudulent financial reporting becomes a major concern. This study examines the Fraud Hexagon Theory in identifying fraudulent financial reporting. This study uses a quantitative approach with a focus on financial companies in the banking subsector listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2020–2022, with a total of 47 companies. The sample was selected using purposive sampling, including companies that published complete annual reports and were identified as committing fraudulent financial reporting at least once in three years of observation. The results of the study indicate that financial stability and rationalization have a positive effect on fraudulent financial reporting, while ineffective monitoring, capability, arrogance, and collusion have a negative effect. These findings indicate that financial pressure and internal justification increase the risk of fraud, while the effectiveness of supervision and certain individual factors can reduce the tendency to manipulate financial reporting. This study provides insights for regulators, auditors, and stakeholders in improving supervision and mitigating fraud risks in the banking sector. The resulting policy implications can be used to strengthen the internal control system and reduce the potential for fraudulent financial reporting in the future.
Downloads
References
Adib, N., Rahma, M., & Widya, A. (2024). Financial reporting in the perception of heptagon fraud theory. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 12(6), 2559-2568.
Agusputri, H., & Sofie, S. (2019). Faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap fraudulent financial reporting dengan menggunakan analisis fraud pentagon. Jurnal Informasi, Perpajakan, Akuntansi, Dan Keuangan Publik, 14(2), 105-124.
Akbar, R. N., Zakaria, A., & Prihatni, R. (2022). Financial statement analysis of fraud with hexagon theory fraud approach. Jurnal Akuntansi, Perpajakan Dan Auditing, 3(1), 137-161.
Amyar, F., Rahma, A., Azis, N., & Suwarno, S. (2023). The effect of auditor’s professional skepticism and whistleblowing system on fraud detection: evidence from indonesian public sector audit. Research Horizon, 3(4), 477-486.
Beasley, M. S., Hermanson, D. R., Carcello, J. V, & Neal, T. L. (2010). Fraudulent financial reporting: 1998-2007: An analysis of US public companies.
Clemente-Suárez, V. J., Navarro-Jiménez, E., Moreno-Luna, L., Saavedra-Serrano, M. C., Jimenez, M., Simón, J. A., & Tornero-Aguilera, J. F. (2021). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social, health, and economy. Sustainability, 13(11), 6314.
Din, M., Paranoan, S., Azdar, F., & Ralis, G. (2022). The effect of accrual-based accounting training and assistance on the knowledge improvement of financial report management at local government units. Economic and Business Horizon, 1(2), 1-12.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of management review, 14(1), 57-74.
Faradiza, S. A. (2019). Fraud pentagon dan kecurangan laporan keuangan. EkBis: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 2(1), 1-22.
Handayani, R., Sutarjo, A., & Yani, M. (2021). Pengaruh pressure, opportunity dan rationalization (fraud triangle) terhadap financial statement fraud. Pareso Jurnal, 3(3), 683-694.
Haryani, F., Nasta’in, F., Novitasari, I., Putri, W., & Manurung, H. (2023). Internal auditor’s responsibilities for quality control of financial reporting at PT Asabri (Persero): A Qualitative Analysis. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Kesatuan, 11(2), 593-598.
Indarti, I., Apriliyani, I. B., & Oemar, F. (2018). Deteksi potensi risiko kecurangan laporan keuangan menggunakan fraud score model pada perusahaan perbankan di bursa efek Indonesia, periode 2015-2016. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 6(2), 153-163.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Teori perusahaan: perilaku manajerial, biaya agensi dan struktur kepemilikan. Jurnal ekonomi keuangan, 3(4), 305-360.
Kusumosari, L., & Solikhah, B. (2021). Analisis kecurangan laporan keuangan melalui fraud hexagon theory. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(3), 753-767.
Maryani, N., Natita, R. K., Rudiana, R., & Herawati, T. (2022). Fraud hexagon elements as a determination of fraudulent financial reporting in financial sector services. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute Journal, 5(1), 4300-4314.
Mukaromah, I., & Budiwitjaksono, G. S. (2021). Fraud hexagon theory dalam mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan pada perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2015-2019. Kompak: Jurnal Ilmiah Komputerisasi Akuntansi, 14(1), 61-72.
Munawar, Z., Herdiana, Y., Suharya, Y., & Putri, N. I. (2021). Pemanfaatan Teknologi Digital Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Tematik, 8(2), 160-175.
Novita, N. (2019). Teori fraud pentagon dan deteksi kecurangan pelaporan keuangan. Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer, 11(2), 64-73.
Prastika, A. N., & Sasongko, N. (2023). Analysis of fraudulent financial reporting with fraud hexagon theory in financial sector companies listed on the Indonesia stock exchange (IDX) In 2017-2021. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 7(1), 239-249.
Priadana, M. S., & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Tangerang: Pascal Books.
Puspitadewi, E., & Sormin, P. (2018). Pengaruh fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi financial statement fraud: studi pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2014–2016. Jurnal akuntansi, 12(2), 146-162.
Putri, R. (2024). Green accounting to supporting sustainable development goals of tourism objects in Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 12(4), 495-504.
Ratnasari, E., & Solikhah, B. (2019). Analisis kecurangan laporan keuangan: pendekatan fraud pentagon theory. Gorontalo Accounting Journal, 2(2), 98-112.
Sari, S. P., & Nugroho, N. K. (2020). Financial statements fraud dengan pendekatan vousinas fraud hexagon model: Tinjauan pada perusahaan terbuka di Indonesia. IHTIFAZ: Islamic Economic, Finance and Banking (ACI-IJIEFB), 409-430.
Septiningrum, K. E., & Mutmainah, S. (2022). Analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi terjadinya financial statement fraud: perspektif fraud hexagon theory (studi empiris pada perusahaan sektor perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2018–2020). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 11(4).
Septriani, Y., & Handayani, D. (2018). Mendeteksi kecurangan laporan keuangan dengan analisis fraud pentagon. Jurnal Akuntansi Keuangan Dan Bisnis, 11(1), 11-23.
Skousen, C. J., Smith, K. R., & Wright, C. J. (2009). Detecting and predicting financial statement fraud: The effectiveness of the fraud triangle and SAS No. 99. In Corporate governance and firm performance (pp. 53-81). Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Syifani, P. A. (2021). Preventive detection system pada kecurangan laporan keuangan berbasis hexagon fraud analysis (studi empiris pada perusahaan bumn yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia tahun 2015–2019). (Thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta).
Tessa, G. C., & Harto, P. (2016). Fraudulent financial reporting: Pengujian teori fraud pentagon pada sektor keuangan dan perbankan di Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).
Vermeer, T. E., Raghunandan, K., & Forgione, D. A. (2009). Audit fees at US non‐profit organizations. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 289-303.
Vousinas, G. L. (2019). Advancing theory of fraud: the score model. Journal of Financial Crime, 26(1), 372-381.
Wolfe, D. T., & Hermanson, D. R. (2004). The fraud diamond: considering the four elements of fraud. The CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42.
Yesiariani, M., & Rahayu, I. (2016). Analisis fraud diamond dalam mendeteksi (studi empiris pada perusahaan LQ-45 yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia tahun 2010-2014). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XIX, Lampung, 1-22.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





